Increase in mothers choosing life drives 12% decline in abortion
Many pundits and writers have spouted different theories but what has been lacking is a straightforward look at what the data actually says. One claim is that the decline is abortion is simply a factor of fewer women getting pregnant but the facts do not back this up. Between the reported periods of 2010 to 2013, live births declined by just 1.4% yet abortion declined by a much greater 12%. If the abortion decline was just a matter of fewer pregnancies then we would expect a similar decline in births.
The statistics don’t back their arguments. In 2010, 18% of pregnancies ended in abortion compared to live birth. In 2013, this figure had dropped to 16.4%. This decline in abortion rate accounts for 62,755 fewer abortions. Out of a total abortion decline of 86,529, this mean that 72.5% of the decline was driven by a lower percentage of pregnant women choosing abortion. Now this doesn’t tell us why women were choosing life for their babies, and that can be debated, but it does tell us that fewer pregnancies is not the main factor.
That said, fewer pregnancies were a meaningful factor and account for the remaining 27.5% of the decline. Interestingly, this trend has reversed with live births rising in 2014 and causing CNN to declare an end to the “great baby recession.” Pregnancy rates are impacted by factors such as frequency of sexual activity, fertility, and consistency and effectiveness of contraceptive use.
One other claim is that fewer women choose abortion because the ones that would have aborted are now the ones using contraception or abortifacients. But the data from the CDC doesn’t back this up. In 1982 unintended births were 36.5%. In the latest CDC report on this matter, which is from 2006-2010, unintended births were 37.1%. The unintended pregnancy rate has been just as stubborn as it consistently registers in the high 40s. As Michael J. New pointed out in a recent article, “according to data from the Guttmacher Institute, the percentage of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion fell from 54 percent in 1994 to 40 percent in 2008.” This tells us that the decline in women choosing abortion is mostly being driven by a change in the response to pregnancy, not in the situations that women find themselves in.
What is clear is that the headlines declaring this abortion decline as merely a factor of less pregnancy are false. Overall since the early 1980s we have seen a steady decrease in the percentage of women choosing abortion from about 29% down to 16.4% today. The big question we should be asking is “why are so many women choosing life”? This questions deserves more study. We think a big part has been the greater visibility of children in the womb thanks to improved ultrasound technology. Combined with growing pro-life advocacy, we see that many Americans now view abortion as a direct assault on human rights.
Data Notes: California, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Wyoming health departments do not report any abortion totals and so they are not included in the analysis by the Associated Press or us. The analysis is based on the reaming 45 states. We hope all states would report comprehensive abortion statistics as this aids public policy discussions. We encourage data scientists as well as interested readers to view our full analysis based on CDC and official state reports at: https://liveactionnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Abortion_Data_45.pdf
Source: LiveAction News
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment