ObamaCare’s massive costs to ordinary citizens starting to become known
By Dave Andrusko
Typically we’ve made the update on ObamaCare’s latest round of disasters one of the first items posted at nationalrighttolifenews.org. However so much rolls in during the course of the day that on at least some days we’ll make it the last post.
What’s the latest? Since this is the final item of the day, I will summarize in bullet points:
· Remember those cost savings
–individually and as a nation—that were promised? Well the New York
Times reports, “For months, the Obama administration has heralded the
low premiums of medical insurance policies on sale in the insurance
exchanges created by the new health law. But as consumers dig into the
details, they are finding that the deductibles and other out-of-pocket
costs are often much higher than what is typical in employer-sponsored
health plans.” Having talked to many family members and others with more
specialized knowledge, when Robert Pear of the Times wrote “much
higher,” he was actually understating the costs for many categories of
people.
· How can that be and why is that so?
The “how/why” is not new; it’s only that only recently has the ordinary
citizen been able to have the numbers (roughly) spelled out for them.
Pear brilliantly summarizes what we have found out, shopping for
insurance for our children: “Until now, it was almost impossible for
people using the federal health care website to see the deductible
amounts, which consumers pay before coverage kicks in. But federal
officials finally relented last week and added a ‘window shopping’
feature that displays data on deductibles. For policies offered in the
federal exchange, as in many states, the annual deductible often tops
$5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a couple. Insurers devised the
new policies on the assumption that consumers would pick a plan based
mainly on price, as reflected in the premium. But insurance plans with
lower premiums generally have higher deductibles.” Yes, that is $5,000
for an individual, $10,000 for a couple. To get lower numbers you have
MUCH higher premiums.
· As many have observed, including,
us, the public is now being told relentlessly that Healthcare.gov is
humming with efficiency (we will doubtless later be told that all was
not sweetness and light). But writing in the New York Post, Michael
Tanner, begins, “The good news, if you want to call it that, is that
roughly 1.6 million Americans have enrolled in ObamaCare so far. The
not-so-good news is that 1.46 million of them actually signed up for
Medicaid. If that trend continues, it could bankrupt both federal and
state governments.”
· Then there are states that have
their own versions of ObamaCare. Here’s what Jim Geraghty of “Morning
Jolt” wrote today. “Although state officials have provided the public
scant detail about the troubled launch of Maryland’s version of
Obamacare, emails and documents show that the project was beset behind
the scenes for months by an array of technical issues, warring
contractors and other problems. Since Maryland’s online health exchange
opened Oct. 1 for people to buy insurance under the Affordable Care Act —
and immediately crashed — the two main companies in charge of the
website have taken their fight to court, a corporate project manager was
replaced and a high-powered consulting firm was quietly brought in to
restore order. Though state officials initially said the crash of the
online exchange was an unexpected and fixable problem, emails and
documents obtained by The Baltimore Sun through state open-records laws
outline serious issues before and after the launch.”
· There are also security concerns galore, too numerous to go into.
·
Finally there was appearance of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (one of the
architects of ObamaCare) on Fox News Sunday, with Chris Wallace. Under
the headline, “Belligerent Zeke Emanuel Again Helps the Anti-Obamacare
Cause in Sunday Chris Wallace Interview,” Newsbusters’ Tom Blumer
observes that Wallace pressed Emanuel “until he forced a ‘yes’ out of
him to a simple question: ‘Didn’t he (President Obama) say, ‘If you like
your doctor, you can keep your doctor.’” That move brought out
Emanuel’s ridiculous contention that what Obama somehow really meant
was, ‘If you want to pay more for an insurance company that covers your
doctor, you can do that. This is a matter of choice.’”
Source: NRLC News
No comments:
Post a Comment