No Bum’s Rush to Declaring Brain Death!
By Wesley J. Smith
This is a good example why people are losing trust in the health care system.
Over at CNN, medical producer Stephanie Smith writes a story arguing that we should do away with second opinions in determining brain death. From, “Repeat Exams for Brain Death Bad for Organ Donation:”
“For brain dead patients, a second
examination to declare death is not only unnecessary but may also have
the unwanted effect of steering family members away from donating the
patient’s organs, according to a new study published in the journal
Neurology. Not one brain dead patient in the study recovered brain
function between the first and second exams…
“A single examination is sufficient
to diagnose brain death and should be the medical standard. There is
simply no benefit to a second exam. None.”
“They were told there was no chance
of their son surviving after he suffered devastating injuries in a car
crash. But Steven Thorpe’s parents refused to give up hope – despite
four specialists declaring that the 17-year-old was brain dead.
“Convinced they saw a ‘flicker’ of
life as Steven lay in a coma, John and Janet Thorpe rejected advice to
switch off his life support machine. They begged for another opinion –
and it was a decision that saved him.
“A neurosurgeon found faint signs of
brain activity and two weeks later, Steven woke from his coma. Within
seven weeks, he had left hospital.”
That is a very rare circumstance. But no doctor is infallible. Just
as we should get second or third opinions when diagnosed with cancer,
easy ability to obtain second or third opinions that a patient’s brain
is forever gone is good patient advocacy.Why the rush to judgment? Organs! Back to CNN:
‘As the space between the first and
second exams increased, so did the likelihood of a family refusing to
donate organs – from 23% to 36% – according to the study. Conversely,
the longer it took to declare a patient brain dead, the less likely the
patient’s organs would be donated – decreasing from 57% to 45%…
“Not only is the opportunity for
organ donation reduced, but families may endure unnecessary suffering
while waiting an average of 19 hours for the second exam to confirm that
their loved one is, in fact, still dead.”
The point of declaring someone dead, however it is done, isn’t organ donation. It’s determining whether a human being is alive or gone.
But don’t tell that to the organ professional:
“One reason for delaying diagnosis
may be to dispel any notion that physicians are rushing the organ
donation process, according to the study. However, dispelling that
notion may be thwarting transplantation. ‘We have to just get over it,’
said Lustbader, who is also assistant medical director of the New York
Organ Donor Network. ‘No one wants to talk about death or diagnose it,
but we have to and we have to do it in a sensitive, compassionate and
timely way.’”
“Get over it?” Good grief, given the consequences of an erroneous
determination, not “getting over it” is not only wise, but prudent.This is why presumed consent to obtain organs won’t work in the USA. We already see that the most catastrophically ill and injured among us are coming to be viewed as organ farms.
I’ll tell you this: If I had to decide to allow organs to be donated upon brain death, I probably would. But not if the hospital refused a second opinion a few days apart to be extra sure that my loved one was truly dead.
Editor’s note. This appeared on Wesley’s blog.
Source: NRLC News
No comments:
Post a Comment