Tuesday, February 26, 2013

RU 486/ RU Crazy






 

Under reported story


By Dave Andrusko
TimeMagRU486Over the course of the last 20 years no one has written more intelligently or in greater depth about the two-drug RU-486 abortion technique than Dr. Randall K. O’Bannon, NRLC’s Director of Education. The two latest examples of his scholarship can be read at http://nrlc.cc/13KEYVg and http://nrlc.cc/ZEIaVt, but there are dozens and dozens more.
From the earliest days in the Clinton Administration, Dr. O’Bannon carefully demonstrated how pro-abortionists greased the skids to make it possible for RU-486 to be distributed in the United States. The earliest slogans were variations of how “natural” RU-486 abortions supposedly were (like a “miscarriage”), and certainly how “easy” and “painless” they were. In fact, they are anything but natural and often incredibly painful, not to mention dangerous. The agony is, in many cases, excruciating and women have died after ingesting this power chemical “cocktail.”
Over at liveactionnews.org, Sarah Terzo has compiled a number of quotations, many from pro-abortion sources, that demonstrate how much pain can and is associated with these “medical abortions” (as pro-abortionists like to call them). Here are just two examples.
Terzo quotes from an article from the Boston Phoenix, which details the RU-486 abortion this woman had at six weeks.
“Back at the dorm, hours later, I know that I writhed in my twin bed, suffering from debilitating, convulsing cramps. My roommates, best friend, and boyfriend hovered around; they brought me pain killers, Tiger Balm, hot-water bottles, and applesauce, and all the while they stroked my head and conferenced in the background about how I was doing. I bled profusely as my body rejected the fetus that had been described to me as “the size of a grain of rice.” I threw up. And finally, I fell asleep.”
Terzo follows that up a post that appeared on the pro-life website Pregnant Pause
“The pain made me scream in tortuous wails. I lay on my boyfriend’s couch, the first night alone, and writhed, twisted and contorted my body praying that either I would die or the pain would stop. I called the emergency number they gave me and told them that the pain killers were not working. They said very callously that there was nothing more they could do for me, informing me that this is normal and to just wait it out. After two nights of what I thought would end this nightmare I began to bleed, a little. On the third day after the contractions I passed the first “tissue” mass. I thought, that’s it, it’s over, now I can begin to heal, right? WRONG!!!!!!
About one and a half weeks later while watching TV I began to feel very ill, and began to cramp up again. Thinking this must be normal (yeah right), at first I thought nothing of it. Within two hours I began to bleed very heavily. The bleeding became increasing worse; eventually I couldn’t get off the toilet. I began to pass blood clots the size of golf balls, and yet another fleshy mass. The cramps became contraction and the bleeding became uncontrollable, I went through a pack of maximum strength maxi pads inside of 12 hours. While sleeping the first night I ruined three pairs of P.J. pants. I again called the emergency number the clinic provided me with and they said it was normal and to just wait it out.
The next day the bleeding was still relentless and the pain only bearable because I was still breathing. I called the clinic, again, and they told me that the doctor said it was a “delayed abortion”. There was still nothing they could do and it was normal. I lay all day bleeding, crying and thinking I must be crazy. As the day progressed it became increasingly hard for me to get up and walk to the bathroom. I began to pass out if I stood up. It finally got to the point that my boyfriend had to carry me to the bathroom, because I could no longer stand. Again we called the emergency number and they said if it was that bad I needed to come in. I asked them how they propose I do that since I cannot be more than 5 minutes away from a bathroom, and when I stand up I pass out. At this point I was distressed and angry that I had to endure such suffering, but at the same time I thought maybe I deserved it. After all, it was my fault and my choice not to keep this baby. I knew it was God punishing me for killing one of  his children. Even though my boyfriend, Tom, didn’t want the baby, it was my body, my choice, my suffering, and my consequences.
I called my regular GYN and described the situation to him, he said I needed to go to the emergency room immediately. Upon arrival at the ER they put me in a wheel chair and I waited no more than 10 minutes before I was blood-soaked from the waist down. They rushed me through triage, where they discovered my blood pressure was roughly 60 over 52. The doctors met me in my room where they immediately put me on I.V. fluids and drew blood. I described what was happening over the last 24 hours and the events that had led up to my visit in the ER. The next 12 hours were degrading, humiliating, painful, stressful, and virtually unbearable.”
Terzo adds, “She needed 2 pints of blood and a D&C and was told that if she had not come to the emergency room, she would have died.’
Chemical abortions, used in conjunction with webcams, make it possible for abortionists to kill many more unborn babies in rural locales. It also hugely increases the risks to the mother, because the abortionist is not on site; indeed, he could be hundreds of miles away.

Source NRLC News

Friday, February 22, 2013

2 Lives Lost- Never Had to Happen


Jennifer Morbelli
Jennifer Morbelli

On the webpage today of Newsday, next to the headline "Jennifer Morbelli, New Rochelle teacher, died of complications after abortion, medical examiner says," is a photo of pro-abortion New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the headline, "Cuomo proposes to expand legalization of late-term abortions."

Morbelli was 33 weeks pregnant when she was aborted at LeRoy Carhart's Germantown Reproductive Health Services clinic in Germantown, Maryland, and died Thursday, February 7 at Shady Grove Adventist Hospital.

Bruce Goldfarb, a spokesman for the Maryland medical examiner's office, told reporters that initial findings listed two causes for the death of the 29-year-old Morbelli.

The New Rochelle, New York teacher died when amniotic fluid seeped into her bloodstream ("amniotic fluid embolism following termination of pregnancy") and because of "disseminated intravascular coagulation," according to Newsday's Ken Schachter.

Schachter explained that as "a condition that occurs when small blood clots form in the blood vessels," adding, "Eventually, the proteins needed for clotting can become depleted, which can lead to extensive bleeding throughout the body." A headline for the White Plains Daily Voice read, "White Plains Teacher Bled To Death After Abortion."

Until yesterday, the medical examiner had listed the manner and cause of Morbelli's death as "pending."  A spokeswoman for the Montgomery County, Maryland, Police Department, which is investigating Morbelli's death, said investigators are awaiting the full autopsy report. This is typically issued anywhere from 30-90 days after a death.

In Maryland the manner of death is defined as "natural," "undetermined," "accidental," "homicide" and "suicide."  The medical examiner chose to designate the manner of death for Morbelli as "natural."

Morbelli's first visit to Carhart's Germantown Reproductive Health Services came Sunday, February 3. (Abortions this late in pregnancy take place over several days.)

"In the days after Feb. 3, the woman returned to the clinic several times, an indication of a multi-day abortion procedure that involved inducing labor, abortion opponents have said," the Washington Post's Dan Morse and Lena Sun reported. "Complications arose, and on Feb. 7, she arrived at Shady Grove Adventist Hospital, where state and local officials say she died that day."

Morbelli's death "has again cast a national spotlight on a small clinic that opened inside a nondescript office park in Germantown a little more than two years ago," Morse and Sun wrote. "The clinic's leader, LeRoy Carhart, is one the few doctors nationwide who publicly acknowledges performing late-term abortions. He has declined to comment."

When news of Morbelli's death first broke, it was a reminder that Carhart had performed late-term abortions in Nebraska until 2010 when the state passed the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. "One hopes that Maryland authorities will do a thorough investigation in this case and what ramifications it will have on Carhart continuing to do late-term abortions in Germantown," said Nebraska Right to Life Executive Director Julie Schmit-Albin. The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which is the law in seven states, bars abortions on babies capable of experiencing pain, established to be no later than 20 weeks.

Carhart still lives in Nebraska but flies into perform abortions at the Germantown, Maryland abortion clinic which is located about 30 miles north of Washington.

A few days after Morbelli's death the Omaha World-Herald reported that an online obituary said Morbelli was married and taught in New Rochelle, N.Y. Robby Korth and Roseann Moring concluded their story, "It also listed her baby girl as having died Thursday."

Source: National Right to Life

Call Lives Depend on It

 
  Call to Action
Committee Hearing on Tuesday for Marriage Bill

Committee Hearing on Tuesday for Marriage Bill
Written By David E. Smith

Thank you!  Thank you!  Thank you!
The turnout for our Defend Marriage Lobby Day on Wednesday was beyond our expectations. I thank each and everyone of you who came out to participate in the largest pro-family event at the Illinois Capitol in memory. Various reports suggest that between 3000 and 5000 people converged on the Capitol!  Our presence will reverberate for weeks and months to come.
Showing up was an important first step in the effort to stop the “fast track” effort to redefine marriage. Now we must maintain pressure on our state representatives so they don’t cave in to the homosexual lobby.
Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) has assigned the so-called “Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act,” SB 10 to the Illinois House Executive Committee, which will hear the bill on Tuesday at 3:00 PM. If you are willing and able to  come again to Springfield for this hearing, that would be wonderful. You can help lobby legislators and fill out witness slips against this anti-family legislation.
The Executive Committee is made up of 7 Democrats and 4 Republicans, so the outcome may be a foregone conclusion. However, I would encourage calls and/or emails to the committee members:
Chairperson:  Daniel Burke (D-Chicago)
(773) 471-2299 or burkedj2@ilga.gov
Vice-Chair: Robert Rita (D-Blue Island)
(708) 396-2822  or robertbobrita@aol.com
GOP Spokesman: Ed Sullivan (R-Mundelein)
(847) 566-5115 or ILhouse51@sbcglobal.net
Rep. Edward Acevedo (D-Chicago)
(773) 843-1500 or acevedo@sbcglobal.net
Rep. Luis Arroyo (D-Chicago)
(773) 637-2000 or RepDistrict3@gmail.com
Rep. Maria Antonia Berrios (D-Chicago)
(773) 736-3939 or repberrios39@gmail.com
Rep. Keith Farnham (D-Elgin)
(847) 841-7130 or krfarnham@gmail.com
Rep. Eddie Lee Jackson, Sr. (D- East St. Louis)
(618) 875-9950 or bbsty2010@gmail.com
Rep. Renee Kosel (R-Mokena)
(708) 479-4200 or rkosel@ilga.gov
Rep. Joe Sosnowski (R-Rockford)
(815) 547-3436 or repsosnowski@gmail.com
Rep. Michael Tryon (R-Crystal Lake)
(815) 459-6453 or Mike@miketryon.com
If SB 10 is passed into law, marriage will be redefined for everyone, stripping it of sexual complementarity. Anyone who does not agree with this new definition of marriage will soon find themselves facing legal consequences as has happened in other states and countries. This will include  lawsuits, loss of employment, facing disciplinary boards, etc. Individuals, small businesses, churches, and religious groups are all at risk.
To see how many of our “tolerant” government officials would treat dissenting views or speech, just remember what happened when Chick-Fil-A’s CEO Dan Cathy spoke out in favor of natural marriage. His company was threatened with being blacklisted and forbidden to do businesses in Chicago. Mayor Rahm Emanuel went so far as to say that “Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago’s values.” (Contrast that with Emanuel’s recent defense of an offensive “hook-up” billboard in downtown Chicago in which he said, “We do have a First Amendment.”)
Elected officials in Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Washington DC said the same thing: Chick-Fil-A was not welcome because the owner holds a traditional view of marriage. The mayor of the District of Columbia where same-sex “marriage” was imposed by their legislature said, “there is just no place for them [supporters of traditional marriage] in this city.”
How long before they tell our churches, our ministries, and our families that our values are not their values?  
Take ACTION:  If you haven’t yet sent an email or a fax to your state lawmakers, it is time to speak up now!  Click HERE to let them know what you think.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Call Your Represenative- Defend Marriage

  





    





   'Defend Marriage'Lobby Day in Illinois

                   There's Still Time
                               To 
               Make Your Voice Heard

Today being Lobby Day for Defending Marriage - thousands of Illinois citizens will be in Springfield, lobbying their representatives. If you were unable to make a trip to Springfield, please know that you can still lobby your representatives either in person (at their local office) or by phone.

Shortly after the new Illinois General Assembly was sworn in on January 9th, State Representative Greg Harris (D-Chicago) and State Senator Heather Stearns (D-Chicago) introduced their marriage redefinition bills which will legalize homosexual marriages, deceptively titled, "The Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act."

High profile politicians, television stars and the media are rallying in favor of the redefinition of marriage. So it is imperative that those of us, who stand for defending traditional marriage, have our voices heard!

    Contact Your State Representative
                            And
    Urge them to Vote NO on HB110
                                                          
If you would like some points to base your arguments on - here are some very pertinent questions to pose to your lawmaker, from the Illinois Family Institute:

1.)   What is marriage? What are the inherent, fundamental constituent features of marriage?
2.)     Supporters of this bill claim that marriage has no inherent connection to gender, sexual complementarity, or reproductive potential. If marriage has no inherent connection to gender, sexual complementarity or reproductive potential, why are you limiting it to two people?
3.)      Marriage revisionists claim that the sole defining feature of marriage is love. They claim that marriage is solely about "who loves whom." If that's so, why is the government involved? Does the government have a vested interest in affirming the love of those in an inherently non-reproductive type of relationship?
4.)      Do children have an inherent right to a mother and a father?
5.)      Since many claim that access to marriage is a "civil right," could you tell me what civil rights are? Is access to civil rights guaranteed to couples or to individuals?
6.)      Are polyamorists and bisexuals denied their civil rights and are they being treated unequally since they cannot marry the persons they love?
7.)      Since marriage revisionists assert that the prohibition of "same-sex marriage" is analogous to the prohibition of interracial marriage, could you tell me in what specific ways homosexual unions are analogous to interracial unions?
8.)      In educating yourself on this issue that will radically alter marriage and culture, can you tell me specifically what you've read about marriage, including what marriage is, and how the legalization of "same-sex marriage" would affect the culture?

Compel your lawmaker to defend his or her vote with actual reasons rather than superficial sound bites - and persist until they answer.

Two years ago 4,000 homeschooling parents rallied in Springfield to protest a proposed law that would have required them to register their children with the state.

      Just this past Valentine's Day,
         Senator Pamela Althoff,
from the 32nd District in the Illinois General Assembly, changed her position from voting in favor of the same-sex marriage bill, to voting against it - due to, "her constituents overwhelmingly lobbying her via phone calls, emails etc. to vote against the Bill.

                
This proves we do have the power to influence our representatives.

But, if we say and do nothing, we will have no right to complain afterward.

The Catholic Church teaches "Marriage is a Sacrament" - The "Sacrament of Matrimony" the Latin interpretation of matrimony simply means "to make a mother". This definitely, underscores a purpose to marriage, which goes far beyond the simple union of any two people for their own feelings or designs.


In other words - Marriage - Matrimony - is all about mankind's cooperation with His Creator in the act of Creation - an act which can only take place between the different complimentary sexes. Two men can certainly not share their DNA to create a new life - nor can two women share DNA with each other in order to engender new life.   In both cases, DNA must be borrowed ... ie ... purchased from others in order to produce children for their same-sex union. This has led to turning our human DNA into a commodity, rather than the GIFT of LIFE, with which God blessed us.  

Same-sex (so called) marriage certainly ignores this - as well as the welfare of children. It's all about their own wants - and they want you and I to accommodate those wants.

               Make Your Voice Heard!
                   There's Still Time!  


             

Wednesday, February 20, 2013


 National Review on Line
 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo seeks to impose a radical new abortion regime on the state, one that goes far beyond the euphemistic byword “choice.” The bill would in fact limit many choices, for instance the choice of Catholic hospitals and other institutions with moral objections to decline to allow abortions to be performed in their facilities. It would limit the choices of organizations that counsel pregnant women if their counseling were held to be insufficiently enthusiastic about abortion. It would limit the choices of organizations that seek to help women in crisis without involving themselves in the politics of abortion. The anodyne-sounding “Reproductive Health Act” is a very bad proposal indeed. Where it regulates, it regulates the wrong parties in the wrong way. But it also deregulates with equal disregard: It would among other things allow persons other than physicians to perform abortions. That is an innovation borrowed from Jerry Brown’s California, where midwives and nurses are permitted to perform abortions. The State of New York will not permit a burly man to lift a box without a state permit to operate a moving company, but gynecological surgery apparently is to be considered a matter for immediate regulatory relief. New York does not want for access to abortion. Two in five pregnancies end in abortion in New York City; the rate for black women is 60 percent. The statewide figures are lower, but they are high enough. There are about 250 abortion clinics in the state, and 93 percent of the state’s women live in a county that is home to an abortion facility, according to the Guttmacher Institute. Nationally, abortion kills the equivalent of the combined populations of Atlanta and Cleveland every year. All that with no help from Governor Cuomo. Governor Cuomo’s bill is not about easing access to abortion — those bloody skids already are well-greased. The issue is political domination. The abortion party does not brook resistance, and it steadfastly seeks to ensure that everybody has a hand in its grisly business: taxpayers, employers, priests. All must be implicated. If a religious hospital declines to provide abortions, then it must be forced to do so. If a counseling center treats adoption as preferable to abortion, it will either change its mind or have its mind changed for it by the gentle persuasion of the State of New York. Like the abortion provisions in the Patient Protection Act, Governor Cuomo’s proposal is a gross assault on individual liberties. The free exercise of religion requires that institutions not be forced to violate their precepts and their consciences; freedom of speech means that counseling services must be free to express their views, regardless of whether those views are welcome in Albany. Even those who support the right to abortion ought to be able to appreciate that “choice” also applies to those who do not wish to provide abortions, to house abortionists, or to finance them. Governor Cuomo began his term in a conciliatory fashion, concentrating on nuts-and-bolts issues related to budgets and state services. He presented himself as a moderate, and was welcomed as one. The lesson he apparently has drawn from the reelection of Barack Obama is that being a cultural lightning rod can pay political dividends if you know how to run the game. That sort of calculation on a run-of-the-mill political issue would be merely cynical; in this case, it is monstrous. No woman in New York is being denied an abortion because of public policy. But Governor Cuomo’s proposal will ensure that many vulnerable women and children are denied much-needed services and care. It will do so by forcing many providers of health care and social services out of the business. Just as the Diocese of Boston dropped its adoption program rather than comply with Massachusetts’s demand that it place children into same-sex households, agencies providing services to women will direct their resources elsewhere rather than become involved in abortion. The Catholic Archdiocese of New York alone operates about 90 social-service institutions—and Governor Cuomo apparently is willing to sacrifice the people who rely on them in order to advance his political career. Perhaps the next time Governor Cuomo arranges to have his picture taken in front of the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Albany, Bishop Hubbard will ask him about that.

Friday, February 15, 2013

A Tragedy that Did Not Have to Be

29 year old Jennifer Morbelli's instructions after her 33 week abortion at Leroy Carhart's Maryland abortion clinic, was to NOT go to the ER in the event of an emergency. At a Maryland Coalition for Life (MDCFL) press conference in Germantown, Maryland where it was announced that a 29 year-old woman was pronounced dead at a Germantown hospital as a direct result of complications from a 3rd trimester abortion. The abortion was performed by Dr. LeRoy Carhart. Carhart, former associate of late-term abortionist George Tiller, was recently hailed a "hero" in the film "After Tiller" at the Sundance Film Festival. Carhart was the abortionist who performed a late-term abortion on a young woman with Downs Syndrome who died following complications from that abortion in 2005 at Women's Heath Care Services in Wichita, KS. The young woman who died Thursday was approximately 33 weeks pregnant and came to see Carhart for an abortion procedure that lasted four days and ended in her death from apparent blood loss and shock, according to MDCFL. Another botched abortion at an Elkton, Maryland resulted in a woman suffering from a ruptured uterus and the discovery of three dozen late-term aborted fetuses in the clinic freezer. This led Maryland, one of the most abortion-friendly states in the country, to quietly enact stricter abortion facility regulations in July, 2012. Those regulations require licensure of facilities and basically mirror regulations that govern outpatient surgical facilities. MDCFL has learned that while Carhart's facility was recently licensed by the state, no actual inspection took place prior to that licensure to guarantee that the facility conformed to the new MD regulations. This senseless tragedy should serve as a wake-up call to abortion supporters who continually insist that abortion is "health-care" and is safe for women. As we have seen over and over again in states like Pennsylvania, Arizona, Marylandand Kansas, abortion facilities and procedures remain unsanitary and unsafe. Late-term abortions are particularly dangerous. Late term abortion complications include, but are not limited to pain, bleeding, shock, infection and instrumental injury, according to S.V. Gaufburg, professor of medicine at Harvard University. U.S. mortality rates per 100,000 abortions are 14.0 for procedures at 16-20 weeks of gestation and 18.0 for procedures after 21 weeks of gestation, according to Gaufberg. A Bartlett study conducted during the years of 1988-1997 paints an even more dire picture. Specifically, it found that per 100,000 abortions, the relative risk of abortion-related mortality was 14.7 at 13–15 weeks of gestation, 29.5 at 16-20 weeks, and 76.6 at or after 21 weeks. The death of the young Maryland woman could have been prevented had abortion been more tightly regulated in her home state. In light of this tragedy, Maryland should consider a total ban on late-term abortions in order to better protect women and families. Maryland, a staunchly pro-abortion state, is not likely to re-think those laws anytime soon, according to LeRoy Carhart, who said in a 2011 interview, "[I] don't think the laws here will change. Maryland is one of the most pro-choice communities in the country." It is time for Maryland to prove Carhart wrong by putting the safety and dignity of its citizens first and outlawing these dangerous procedures. Source: FRC

LeRoy Carhart Abortionsit and HHS Secretary Sebelius

Sebelius linked to late-term abortionist involved in patient death Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has ties to late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart, who was involved in the 33-week abortion death of Jennifer Morbelli on February 7, 2013, in Maryland, that raise concerns that she may attempt to interfere in ongoing investigations involving Carhart. Operation Rescue obtained photographs of a secret party held by Sebelius in 2007 while serving as Governor of Kansas that honored late-term abortionist George Tiller and his entire abortion clinic staff. Carhart and his wife, Mary Lou, were present at that party, which was held while they were under investigation by the State Attorney General's office for suspected illegal late-term abortions. Operation Rescue also has documentation that indicates that Sebelius interfered in a medical board investigation into the death of another of Carhart's third-trimester abortion patients, Christin Gilbert, on January 13, 2005. An investigation was launched by the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts based on a complaint filed by Operation Rescue. Gilbert's death prompted the Kansas Legislature to pursue a law that year, which would have regulated abortion clinics in Kansas. Sebelius adamantly opposed any regulation or accountability for abortion clinics, having vetoed similar laws in previous years. After a Board investigation was opened, Sebelius wrote to her appointee, KSBHA Ex. Director Larry Buening (who was later forced to resign his position), asking for him to report to her on Gilbert's death investigation and to give her an opinion about how the proposed new law would have affected her care. The pro-abortion political climate created by Sebelius, along with her personal interjection into the investigation, led the Kansas Board of Healing Arts to prematurely and publicly "clear" Tiller and Carhart of any culpability in the death of Gilbert a full five months before the politically sanitized autopsy report was even completed. It is no coincidence that the Board's opinions on the Gilbert death were released the same day that an important vote on the clinic regulations bill was scheduled in the Senate. Operation Rescue helped convene a citizen-called grand jury to look into Gilbert's death. During that investigation, Carhart dodged a subpoena for his testimony by staying out of Kansas while the grand jury was in progress. He never testified. The Grand Jury disbanded without handed down indictments. (Read more about this.) "It is regrettable that political corruption in Kansas that was orchestrated and controlled by Sebelius thwarted efforts to hold Carhart accountable in the death of Christin Gilbert. If she had not interfered and an honest investigation had been allowed to proceed, Jennifer Morbelli might be alive today. In a very real sense, the blood of Mrs. Morbelli is on Kathleen Sebelius' hands," said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue and Pro-Life Nation. Now the concern is that Sebelius, with her added power as Secretary of Health and Human Services in the pro-abortion Obama Administration, will also interject herself into the ongoing investigations into the death of Jennifer Morbelli in order to protect her friend, Carhart. "Our experience with Sebelius is that her number one priority is protecting and promoting abortions - even if it means the death women and their babies that our laws are supposed to protect," said Newman. "We call on all authorities investigating the death of Jennifer Morbelli to conduct independent and honest investigations that are free from the influence of Sebelius and her pro-abortion cohorts in the Obama Administration." Source: Operation Rescue via Pro-Life Blogs

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

A Tragedy that Did Not Have To BE

By Darla St. Martin, President, Maryland Right to Life Abortionist LeRoy Carhart Authorities in Maryland are investigating the death of a 29-year-old kindergarten teacher from New York who died Thursday after getting a late-term abortion at the Germantown Reproductive Health Services clinic operated by LeRoy Carhart. State and county officials confirmed that she died at the Shady Grove Adventist Hospital, but offered no details. “I can confirm that, yes, there is a death investigation being coordinated by the Medical Examiner’s Office and the Montgomery Police Department has been notified,” said Lucille Baur, a spokeswoman for the police department. The probe, being conducted by the Maryland Office of Health Care Quality, is ongoing but “At this point, there is no indication of any criminal activity in this case,” Capt. Paul Starks, a spokesman for the Montgomery County Police Department, told the Washington Post. Ingrid Duran, 1st Vice President of Maryland Right to Life, responded, “This tragic double death shows the urgent need for legislation in Maryland to protect women and children from fly in, fly out abortionists like Carhart.” “One hopes that Maryland authorities will do a thorough investigation in this case and what ramifications it will have on Carhart continuing to do late-term abortions in Germantown,” added Nebraska Right to Life Executive Director Julie Schmit-Albin. Carhart had performed late-term abortions in Nebraska until 2010 when the state passed the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. The Act bars abortions on babies capable of experiencing pain, established to be no later than 20 weeks. Carhart still lives in Nebraska but flies into perform abortions at the Germantown, Maryland abortion clinic which is located about 30 miles north of Washington, DC. There was a wake last night for the young woman in Mamaroneck, New York, attended by scores of mourners, according to the Journal News newspaper. Pro-lifers rallied outside Carhart’s abortion clinic yesterday, saying that the woman had arrived at the Germantown Reproductive Health Services clinic Saturday to begin a multiple-day abortion when she was 33 weeks pregnant. Carhart, who has never been shy about talking to the press, has reportedly not responded to any media requests for comment.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Prayers and Gratitude for Pope Benedict

Print Article | Email Friend | Reprint Permissions Shock, gratitude, prayer: pro-life and Catholic leaders react to a Pope’s surprise resignation by Patrick B. Craine ROME, Feb. 11, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – As Catholics and people of good will across the globe grapple with Pope Benedict XVI’s shocking announcement Monday morning that he will resign the papacy at 8 pm on Feb. 28th, Catholic and pro-life leaders are offering gratitude for his eight years at the helm of the Barque of Peter. The media frenzy over the first papal resignation in six hundred years has brought a flurry of response from Church commentators. LifeSiteNews has spoken with numerous leaders at the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life as well as top pro-life activists in Europe and North America who urged prayers for Pope Benedict and the whole Church during this near-unprecedented transition period. In his statement on the Pope’s move, Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York called it “an important moment in our lives as citizens of the world,” and noted Benedict’s tireless defense of human life. “Pope Benedict often cited the significance of eternal truths and he warned of a dictatorship of relativism,” said Dolan, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. “Some values, such as human life, stand out above all others, he taught again and again. It is a message for eternity.” Father Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life and a corresponding member of the Pontifical Academy for Life, said his organization is taking the surprising news in a “positive light,” calling it “an expression of [the Pope’s] concern and love for the Church.” “He wants the Church to have a Pope who can fulfill his role with the strength and vigor that the office requires,” he explained. Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE! Mercedes Wilson, founder of Family of the Americas and an ordinary member of the Pontifical Academy for Life, agreed the news came as a “big shock" but also expressed a certain disappointment. "I think it’s better to leave it to God’s will, to keep at the helm of the Church as long as possible until God takes you,” she said. “But, you know, who am I to judge? I don’t know what the doctors may have told him. He has been a good Pope, faithful to the teachings of the Church. So we have to pray that that was the right decision.” “Let’s hope that who ever is to replace him will be a strong leader that will defend the family and the gift of life as the most precious gift,” she added. “All of Europe and all of the West is suffering from lack of children. Let’s hope that more emphasis can be given to this fact.” John Haas, president of the National Catholic Bioethics Center and a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life’s governing council, said his organization has “always felt a special affinity with Pope Benedict XVI,” noting that he had twice spoken at their workshops for bishops while he served as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF). “When I first the heard the news from Europe, before sunrise here in the United States, I was stunned,” said Haas in a statement sent to LifeSiteNews. “But after the reality settled in, I could not help but smile and think to myself, ‘How admirable is his commitment to duty’!” Haas said Pope Benedict deserves special praise for his contribution to Church teaching on bioethics in the instruction Donum Vitae, which was released by the CDF in 1987 while he served as prefect. “The Church’s moral principles articulated in that document remain unassailable as the surest guide available in our day to address the complex and difficult moral issues arising from advances in micro-biology and ‘reproductive technologies’,” said Haas. “The magisterial, bioethical Dignitas Personae of 2008 builds on that foundational document but certainly does not surpass it.” LifeSiteNews also spoke with pro-life leaders from the U.S., U.K., Canada, and Ireland. Jim Hughes, national president of Canada’s Campaign Life Coalition, said the Pope would be “sorely missed.” “He just seemed to be in the middle of his plan of action. It’ll be a major task now to find someone to fill those shoes,” he said. John Smeaton, director of the U.K.’s Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, thanked the Pope for his “defence of the unchanging teaching on the purpose of human sexuality,” noting especially his emphasis on the connection between the protection of human life and the defense of marriage and family. “Pope Benedict’s statements were wake-up calls to the whole pro-life movement to campaign against same-sex marriage and similar threats to the life-giving meaning of sexuality,” said Smeaton. Niamh Uí Bhriain of Ireland’s Life Institute said that Benedict XVI has been a source of huge inspiration to the pro-life movement worldwide and noted that the Pontiff had recently been outspoken in his opposition to proposals by the Irish government to legalise abortion. "Pope Benedict was clear and unequivocal in his defence of Life, saying that abortion was a 'crime against society', that it ' kills the child and destroys the woman'. He urged all of us to become active in pro-life work, noting that 'God speaks to each of us, inviting us to defend human life at all times'. In that way, the Pope was a great encouragement and leader to people of all faiths and none within the movement." "I join many others in praying that Benedict's successor is blessed with the courage to continue giving vocal support for the protection of human life from conception and without exception," she said. Father Shenan J. Boquet, president of Human Life International, said his organization joins the rest of the universal Church in praying for the Pope. "The suddenness of His Holiness' announcement is cause for concern for his health, as it seems to have caught almost everyone by surprise,” he said. ”Though our concern is more than matched by our gratitude for Pope Benedict's many wonderful gifts to the Church as Holy Father, bishop and priest. His three wonderful encyclicals, his many apostolic letters and addresses have all helped to guide the Church through a difficult period." “His unflinching defense of Church teaching and the most fundamental rights of every human person have inspired our missionaries around the world,” Fr. Boquet added. "So in prayer and gratitude we lift up our Holy Father and the Church he has served, asking the Holy Spirit to guide the cardinals of the Church in their task of choosing Pope Benedict's successor." Speaking on NBC News Monday morning, George Weigel, the famed biographer of Bl. John Paul II, suggested that the Pope’s move should be called an “abdication” rather than a resignation. “A resignation is something that someone hands to someone else,” he explained. “Popes have no one to resign to, so this is an abdication.” “It is obviously unprecedented, but I think we’ve all had the sense, both from the realities of a world where people live much longer than before and from the pope’s words, that this was a real possibility," he added. Deal Hudson, president of Pennsylvania Catholics Network, urged the Cardinals who will elect Benedict’s successor to choose a man who will carry on the Pope’s legacy of reform. He said the Pope’s resignation “ends an era of reform and restoration in the Church that began in November 1978 with the election of John Paul II.” “That Benedict XVI allowed retired Cardinal Roger Mahoney of Los Angeles, a powerful broker of the liberalization following Vatican II, to be stripped of all his archdiocesan duties is symbolic of the changes brought about in the last 35 years under John Paul II and Benedict XVI,” said Hudson. “The cardinals at the upcoming conclave will be faced with the choice of whether to continue the direction marked out by the last two pontiffs.” Michael D. O’Brien, the famed Catholic author and painter, said the move is “understandable,” but “will be a colossal loss for the Church.” “May all Catholics pray fervently for the coming Conclave, that the Holy Spirit will grant us another Man of Truth who embodies caritas and veritas with courage,” he told LifeSiteNews. The Pope’s announcement has also sparked reaction from faith leaders outside the Catholic Church. The U.K.’s Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks said he was “honoured” to welcome the Pope to Britain in 2010 on behalf of non-Christian faiths and to visit him at the Vatican in 2011. “I saw him to be a man of gentleness, of quiet and of calm, a deeply thoughtful and compassionate individual who carried with him an aura of grace and wisdom,” he said. “I wish him good health, blessings and best wishes for the future.” On Facebook, Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, said the Pope “has offered a brave and intelligent defense of truth against a relativist tide, and he has been a stalwart friend of life.”

New Pope Possible By Easter

February 11, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a surprise announcement, Pope Benedict XVI said today that he will resign at the end of the month. The pope said that due to the increased weakness accompanying his advanced age - he is 85 - he feels that he is unable to carry out the duties of his office. "After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths due to an advanced age are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry," he said in a statement to a meeting of Vatican cardinals. "I am well aware that this ministry, due to its essential spiritual nature, must be carried out not only by words and deeds but no less with prayer and suffering. "However, in today's world, subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions of deep relevance for the life of faith, in order to govern the barque of Saint Peter and proclaim the Gospel, both strength of mind and body are necessary, strength which in the last few months, has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me." He is reportedly the first pope to resign in six centuries. The pope is considered one of the strongest allies of the pro-life and pro-family movements, frequently issuing statements defending the natural family and the right to life from conception until natural death. He was elected to the papacy on April 19, 2005. While the decision to resign from the papacy is a highly unusual one, Pope Benedict had in the past said that a pope may even have an "obligation" to resign if he is unable to carry on his duties. "If a pope clearly realizes that he is no longer physically, psychologically and spiritually capable of handling the duties of his office, then he has a right, and under some circumstances, also an obligation to resign," the pope said in an interview for the book "Light of the World."