Pro-Choice Students Rethink Abortion After Studying Chicken Embryos
By Sarah Terzo

6 week human embryo
“Extreme positions may be easier when
 the argument is intellectual. But they don’t hold up at close range. I 
noticed this in my interactions with college students in an anatomy and 
physiology class I taught. The nine students in this all-female class 
were unequivocally in favor of abortion rights when we started the 
section on reproduction. But something changed when they studied live 
chick embryos.
“I had explained to them that all 
vertebrates closely resemble one another during early development. Then 
we open fertilized eggs at various stages. Under a microscope, eggs that
 have incubated for 36 hour show the first rudiments of an embryo, and a
 crude tubular structure rhythmically twitching in the center. At 48 
hours, you can see an elementary – but definitely formed – heart pumping
 red blood cells through a looped network of tubes. You can recognize an
 eye. Just a day later, there are limbs, a face, and a brain that looks 
like linked sausages.
“As the young women looked at these 
early-stage embryos and watched that amazing little heart beating, they 
were moved. ‘If we closed up the shell and put it back in the incubator,
 would it still grow?’ one of them asked me. Another said, ‘It’s going 
to die in a little while under the microscope, isn’t it?’ A third 
student declared, ‘I don’t think we should be doing this.’ And while 
some of my students couldn’t wait to see how the embryo progressed 
through the later stages of development, others became upset and refused
 to open any more eggs.
“When I brought the talk around to 
abortion again, I noticed that their feelings were no longer clear-cut. 
They all upheld a woman’s right to choose, but felt that other factors 
had to be considered, too.” [1]
[1] Ted Merrill “Abortion: Extreme Views Ignore Reality” Medical Economics, July 15, 1996
Editor’s note. This appeared at clinicquotes.com.
Source: NRLC News

No comments:
Post a Comment