skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Governor Lamm 15 years ago said, "elderly people have a duty to die and get out of the way." Why, because of the end of life health care costs. About 1/3 of Medicare's budget goes for costs incurred in the last year of life, and 40% of that goes for the last month of life. Any economist, much less a taxpayer, recognizes that is a lot of money. However, we don't kill old people to save money, or do we?
Enter the Obama health care plan which no one has read - Section 1233 would mandate that a doctor sit down with all patients over 65 years of age to talk about end of life issues and the doctor would be compensated. The idea is to encourage people to sign Living Wills or enter hospice, rather than getting expensive treatment. Since hospice only provides pain relief, everyone saves money. In states where physician-assisted suicide is legal, end of life talks would include assisted-suicide, the cheapest option of all. Could all of this be setting us up for a Supreme Court Roe v. Wade on euthanasia?
All of this is being proposed in the name of compassion. The lawmakers don't like the thought that dying people suffer. The also don't like the idea that a 90 year old with cancer takes a government Handy Van to chemotherapy. It's more compassionate to offer another option, perhaps Governor Lamm's option.
Under Section 1233 in the health care plan, there is a mandated advanced care consultation for senior citizens. The government will instruct and consult regarding Advanced Directives, Living Wills and Durable Power of Attorney, and provide a list of end of life resources that will guide you in how to shorten your life.
Page 427 and 428 specifies training for health care professionals who would be responsible for signing orders for life sustaining treatments, nutrition and hydration, and for the goals and use of those orders. The bill states the government will specify which doctor can write an end of life order.
Also included in the bill, will be mandated school based health clinics that will be integrated into the school environment. Birth control will be dispensed without parental consent or consultation. Children will have access to abortion, Plan B, oral contraceptives and barrier method contraceptives without their parent's knowledge.
Terrifying, horrifying and heart breaking is the latest news from China. In a recent report, China admitted that the exact number of abortions cannot accurately be reported. What China did report was 13 million abortions performed every year in hospitals. These horrifying statistics do not account for the many more known to be carried out in unregulated rural clinics and the 10 million abortion pills (RU 486) sold every year in China.
The report said 62% of the women undergoing abortions were single and aged 20 to 29. The report further said the widespread use of abortion was an unfortunate situation. I would translate that as collateral damage.
The response by some Chinese officials was that sex education needed to be improved. Its family planning controls, including contraception, sterilization and abortion procedures have prevented another 400 million births. China's population is 1.3 billion people. Compare this with the U.S. which has 300 million people and 1.2 million women having abortions each year.
Remember China has a strict mandated and tightly controlled one child policy. This policy was recently rescinded in a small geographical area that suffered a major earthquake which killed mostly children, leaving parents with no offspring.
A thought to ponder - What is happening in China has monumental geo-political consequences because most of the babies aborted are female. Why? Chinese parents place a greater value on the male. What does this lead to geo-politically? - a male dominated society, a militaristic society, a lawless society.
All social engineering is preceded by verbal engineering. Hidden agendas are only brought to light in cases of great catastrophes, so too with the vaccine hoopla. All we hear about is the pandemic and the deaths to come. All the reported statistics are wrong and can be proved with a calculator and the CDC website.
That being said, the University of Alabama has just implemented a mandatory vaccination program. The university sent out an email to all of the students informing them they had to provide proof of several different immunizations before they could register. Failure to provide proof means either the student gets the shots on campus or refusal would prevent them from enrollment and could also lead to further judiciary punishment.
The mandated vaccines are the Manactra-antimeningitis, MMR vaccine, and TB screening within the last year. These are registration requirements. If you live off of campus, they remain requirements. The school further went on, " failure of any student, regardless of classification, not meeting the immunization and TB screening requirements may result in a disruption in ability to register and possible disciplinary action per the office of judicial affairs.
This, in spite of the following evidence - the MMR vaccine has been linked to autism and inflammatory bowel disease. With the meningitis vaccine, 5000 children suffered adverse reactions immediately after it was introduced in Britain.
The Crimson Tide, we hope, will not be adversely effected. I'm sure they will be mandated,too, or will they be exempt because they play in a major bowl game each year bringing untold revenue to the university.
The question is, should vaccines be mandated? If the answer is yes, can the public be assured there are no adverse reactions? At the present time the answer is definitely no, but the testing continues on our young. The next question you should be asking, because it is coming, is how can they be mandated?
The only way to mandate vaccination is by force, which is what many think will happen in the event of the swine flu "pandemic." State health authorities have already confirmed that if the government were to announce a mandatory vaccination program, there would be no exceptions and the use of force could be used.
A health care reform bill approved by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee called "The
Affordable Health Choices Act", will fund the creation of state "intervention" teams that will carry out home visits in order to check on both children and adults.
A federal report has finally reported what many of us knew would happen. A recent federal report revealed that the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil has a 400% higher rate of adverse effects than another comparable vaccine, Menactra anti-meningitis shot.
Wow! The report recommends that the government more thoroughly investigate reports of dangerous side effects from the HPV vaccine. Why? Researchers compared the side effects from Gardasil and Menactra because they are given to similar age groups at the same time. What did this show? Here are the facts from the federal government. Gardasil was associated with twice as many emergency room visits, four times as many deaths, four times as many heart attacks, seven times as many disabled reports and fifteen times as many strokes. All reported cases of blood clots and heart attacks associated with Gardasil occurred when the vaccine was given alone.
For those of you who remember history, Gardasil was fast-tracked by the FDA as was RU 486. Both have proven to be federally funded serial killers.
ORGANS FOR SALE OR RENT
Imagine my surprise to read on July 23rd that in New Jersey a large scam was uncovered that included rabbis, mayors and black market kidneys. There were a total of 44 arrested including 3 mayors, assemblymen and 5 rabbis.
Why? There are multiple reasons including the black market sale of kidneys. Does this report cause some consternation. For me it does. The sale of organs casts a shadow on all organ procurement. In China, before they execute a prisoner, organs are removed. In Cuba, Fidel Castro took blood from prisoners in order to weaken them for execution. The blood products were sold. Robin Cook, author, was the first to blow the whistle on organ trafficking in a book called Coma. Through both domestic and foreign films dealing with illegal trafficking in organs, the public is becoming more aware of this hidden reality.
What is the hidden reality? Should we be concerned? Are the organ donors really dead when they take their organs legally? Why the trafficking? Could something be wrong in our society? Are we becoming utilitarian? Who decides?
After reading about New Jersey, the only thing that amazed me, is that they were caught. How about the people who are trafficking legally and illegally and not caught? Is there a difference?
SMOKE AND MIRRORS
Did anyone wonder why a Sun Times reporter, who I might describe as a longtime feminist, bring up an incident that occurred in Cambridge which had racial overtones during President Obama's health care message to the nation? I certainly did. In fact, I think it was a cover-up.
It took the focus of the nation off of health care and escalated unfounded racial tensions. It undermined law and order, and in fact, it ignored the rule of law. President Obama is too smart a politician to have this happen by coincidence.
Why did it happen? Perhaps it was to cover-up what is really happening in the health care debate. There are many questions, especially in the life area of abortion and euthanasia that have surfaced for a short period of time. These questions have not been answered.
Perhaps health care is on a fast track unknown to the public because their attention has been so easily diverted. Perhaps behind closed doors, not with just a beer, perhaps martinis, leadership in the Democratic party is quickly moving health care along a stealth path.
Time will tell on this one. The loser is the nation and law enforcement. Hopefully, the public will refocus. Elections are around the corner.
VACCINES AND BABY DNA
Did you know there are vaccines that have been derived from aborted babies? Today there are more than 23 vaccines that are contaminated by the use of aborted baby cells. This has caused great controversy in Catholic circles. There is no law that requires consumers to be informed that some vaccines are made by using aborted baby cells. These cells contain residual aborted baby DNA. Newer vaccines produced using aborted baby cells do inform consumers in their package inserts that the vaccines contain contaminating DNA from the cells used to produce the vaccine. They do not identify the cells as being derived from elective aborted human babies.
Translate - They tell you what is in the vaccine, but they don't fully inform you where they came from.
There has been controversy for many years about the vaccine - autism link. The incidence of Autism has risen to 1 out of every 4 boys born and 1 out of every 6 girls, causing the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) to recommend further study of vaccine safety. The NVAC recommends further study on the potential for vaccines to contribute to autism in children who have underlying mitochondrial disease because of the clinical history of children developing autism after vaccination. What the NVAC overlooked is that the epidemic regressive autism is associated with the switch from using animal cells to produce vaccines to the use of aborted baby cells for vaccine production. What this means is when we vaccinate our children some of those vaccines contain aborted human baby DNA.
Autism and autism spectrum disorders are polygenic diseases. This means that multiple genes have been shown to be associated with these diseases. Studies have also clearly shown that there is an environmental component, a trigger that is required. Vaccines are an obvious potential environmental trigger for autism. Why, because of the universal exposure to vaccines.
The question of aborted baby cell DNA in vaccines as a trigger for autism needs to be answered quickly and honestly. Why, because pharmaceutical companies are currently moving to replace more animal-produced vaccines with aborted baby cell production. To make matters worse, they are producing biologic drugs using aborted baby cells.
Parents beware. The practice of using aborted baby cells for vaccine and drug production creates wrenching moral dilemmas for parents and consumers, ignores informed consent rights, and exposes our children and ourselves to contaminants lacking safety evaluation. This issue was discussed in Dignitas Personae.
As the parent and guardian of your child, you have a right to be informed. You also have a moral responsibility to be informed.
You have a right to full disclosure from your physician. Your moral obligation is to ask and then make your decision.
Before becoming pope, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, said, "Truth is not determined by a majority vote." I think that is a true statement in light of November's election outcome.
The Obama administration is married to Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood, has targeted Hispanic women for abortion. Planned Parenthood, this year alone, has revenues approaching 1 billion dollars. Now they are going after the Latino community. How do we know this? Advertising in Spanish papers, that publish only in Latino communities, and to add insult to injury, Planned Parenthood's recent choice of a Mexican American, as its' chaplain.
White women are having less and less abortions. Now Planned Parenthood, which only thinks of women, not revenue, have targeted Hispanic women for abortion. If one was a real thinker, one would think, perhaps this is to make up the revenue they're losing, as the abortion rate in white women declines.
To prove the point, one of Planned Parenthood's Spanish flyers claimed, they are pro-woman, pro-family, pro-child, pro-choice. Of course, everyone knows, that Planned Parenthood is not pro-woman, not pro-family, not pro-child but solidly pro-choice. They have lobbied against the Unborn Victim of Violence Act, which would afford protection to unborn children, against acts of violence. They claim to be pro-choice, but, they oppose a 24 hour waiting period, before a woman makes a final decision to have an abortion. This is a helpful tool, because it allows women to make an informed decision, rather than an emotional one.
Our job in the pro-life movement is to tell the truth.
Massive health care changes are on the rise. The government is poised to take over health care. Included in this massive concoction, is a plan to enshrine abortion, as health care. How ridiculous, killing as healthcare? Well, if you can ok killing unborn babies, you can ok killing handicapped babies and adults, and that will lead to cost containment efforts, by eliminating whole populations in nursing homes. It's called the Brave New World, or in military terms, collateral damage. In the movies, it's called "Soylent Green".
If the President succeeds in eliminating the conscience rights of professionals, there will be professionals, who have no conscience, filling their jobs. Dr. Kevorkian's machine will be obsolete, but his speciality will be enshrined in medicine .. ie .. serial killing. This leads us to quote a quotation from Pastor Martin Niemollar, who opposed the Nazis during WWII. But his words are very applicable for today.
"First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and Trade Unionists, but I was not one of them, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not Jewish, so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak for me."
Oh My Gosh! Now they're taking vaccines from aborted babies? And it's possible that there might be problems? Hard to believe, that killing, doesn't produce problems. Here's the latest ..
Some child vaccinations are derived from aborted babies. In certain denominations, this has produced a dilemma. The dilemma is, should a baby be vaccinated with a vaccine, that has been obtained from an aborted baby?
There are two general principles to consider. First, it is gravely immoral for researchers, to conduct experiments on living embryos, because eventually they will be killed, by the experiment. Secondly, researchers are under the obligation to avoid cooperation in evil and scandal, that relates to their professional activities.
Many parents have become upset knowing, that their children had received some of the vaccines obtained, from the cell lines of aborted babies. This has caused the Catholic Church, to issue the following:
1.) There's a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines.
2.) If there is no alternative, there must be effort to find an alternative source.
3.) It would be passive material cooperation, due to the necessity, to provide for the good of one's child. This means, that danger to the health of children, could permit a parent, to use a vaccine, which was developed using cell lines from aborted babies. This places a moral decision in the hands of the parent. The parent is obligated to look at the situation carefully, and evaluate, whether or not their child and society at large, would be in danger, by not using the aborted fetal vaccine.
4.) The conscience of the parent must decide whether or not this vaccine should be used for their child.
The vaccines we are discussing have been developed from aborted baby cell lines. These were aborted in 1964 and 70. The first, a girl, was aborted because the family felt they had too many children. While the second, a boy, was aborted for psychiatric reasons. The vaccines we are talking about are the rubella, which are by name, Meruavax, Rudivax and Erevax. The combined vaccine MR against rubella and measles, is named, M-R-VAX, and Rudi-Rouvax. The combined vaccine against rubella and mumps, is called Viavax. The combined vaccine MMR (Measles, Mumps & Rubella) M-M-R II. Other vaccines, also prepared using human cell lines from aborted babies are... two vaccines against Hepatitis A, one vaccine against chicken pox, one vaccine against polio, one vaccine against rabies and one vaccine against small pox.
The moral of this story .. parents beware.
Posts
