New Jersey Assembly Vote for Doctor-Prescribed Suicide Raises Threat of Nonvoluntary Euthanasia
By Burke J. Balch, J.D., director, National Right to Life’s Powell Center for Medical Ethics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21de8/21de8088900f06feb35b056e7e5024d532f7a9db" alt="sufferingsufferer"
Ever since the 1976 New Jersey Supreme Court case of In re Quinlan, the state’s courts have held that if someone who has the capacity to do so voluntarily has a legal right, it is unconstitutional to deny that same “right” to someone mentally incapable of choosing to exercise it. Under the doctrine of “substituted judgment,” someone else, such as a relative, must be given the ability to choose, purportedly on the incapacitated person’s behalf, to exercise that right.
Quinlan led the nation in applying this substituted-judgment doctrine to rejection of life-preserving medical treatment. Under that doctrine, vulnerable patients then incapable of making health care decisions for themselves have been denied treatment, or even food and fluids, that could have preserved their lives. The result has been the death of countless thousands– possibly hundreds of thousands– of people who had never asked to die.
If doctor-prescribed suicide becomes a statutory “right” in the state of New Jersey–or in any of the many states that have followed that jurisdiction’s leading in recognizing the doctrine of substituted judgment–it will take only someone bringing a court case to establish the “right” of a grandmother with Alzheimer’s disease to be killed at the direction of someone deemed to have the authority to make that decision.
In short, whether they realize it or not, if New Jersey lawmakers buy “voluntary” euthanasia, the state’s citizens will soon get nonvoluntary euthanasia as well.
Source: NRLC News
No comments:
Post a Comment