Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Rationing in the Health Care Plan

The current Senate Health Care Bill includes President Obama's proposals. We know that these proposals will fund abortion on demand through Community Health Centers. A second deadly concern is rationing of health care. An economic principle is in play here. Price controls on health care will cause rationing.
 
The Obama Administration, as well as a majority of Democrats in the Congress, are commited to an assault on human life. President Obama owes Planned Parenthood and other national pro-abortion groups his presidency. It's pay-back time. Pay-back, in spite of the overwhelming number of Americans, who do not want National Health Care.
 
One sixteenth of our economy is in health care. The government already owns the banks, car dealers, credit card companies, investment firms and mortgage companies. If the government can control health care, they can control the country. We will become socialized members of a socialized state. That's what's at stake. But life is at stake too.
 
Under the President's proposal, federal and or state government agencies, would be empowered to review and reject premiums charged by any health insurance plan. Rhetoric to the contrary, there is no grand-fathering clause for health care plans, which Americans currently hold.
 
To simplify, the primary duty of the government bureaucracies running health care reimbursements, is to hold health care spending down. This means, that we will have government officials canceling our personal health care decisions, in an effort to balance quality of treatment against cost of treatment. In other words, medicine will be all protocol. If treatment doesn't fit the protocol it won't be delivered. Protocols in medicine are a set-up for error. I can just see all the trial lawyers suing doctors for not providing standard of care treatment, because they must operate under protocol. It's an Obama nightmare.
 
Putting it all together, the end result is denial of life-saving diagnostic tests and treatments, because there's no money. I don't think America wants that kind of health care reform. And that's just the beginning of what's in the bill.

1 comment:

Ori Pomerantz said...

Imagine if health insurance companies could decide which medical treatments are legal and which aren't. Then they wouldn't have to worry about paying for expensive treatments, or being sued for not paying for them - those treatments would be unavailable. Period.

With socialized medicine, the same government controls health insurance and the FDA, in effect deciding what treatments would be legal.