Pro-abortionists file another lawsuit challenging portions of Texas’ HB 2
By Dave Andrusko
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f64c/8f64c698ef4681d3d573b40446e8c5e8b6af1fd9" alt="Judge Edith Jones"
Judge Edith Jones
The move comes six days after a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit unanimously upheld provisions of HB 2 that required abortionists to have admitting privileges to a hospital located within 30 miles of the abortion clinic and regulated how far into pregnancy chemical abortifacients can be administered. According to published reports, the CRR could ask the full 5th Circuit to rehear the case. If this is not granted, or if they lose, CRR could ask the Supreme Court to hear the case.
Undeterred by the panel’s unanimous opinion, CRR sent out a press release stating it was filing a federal lawsuit in Austin (1) seeking “an immediate court order blocking the law’s requirement that abortion providers obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals as it applies to Whole Woman’s Health in McAllen and Reproductive Health Services in El Paso”; and (2) to “strike down HB2’s provision that every reproductive health care facility offering abortion services meet the same building requirements as ambulatory surgical centers.” The latter provision does not effect until September 1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/352c8/352c802be35a5f19a63891cfe134426aed626de9" alt="Judge Catharina Haynes"
Judge Catharina Haynes
Noteworthy is the CRR has not challenged (and did not yesterday) the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which is part of HB2. This provision prohibits killing unborn children who have reached the developmental milestone of being able to feel pain, which substantial medical evidence places at 20 weeks, if not earlier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0414a/0414ade4b9e58c647fb192798881b24fbe247474" alt="Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod"
Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod
At the end of November, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal by pro-abortion plaintiffs for a stay, which meant Texas could implement the law.
Source: NRLC News
No comments:
Post a Comment