August 27, 2013 (
Unmasking Choice)
- The embarrassing political troubles of the unfortunately but aptly
named former Congressman Anthony Weiner has catapulted the term
“sexting” into cultural consciousness once again, prompting a sudden
discussion on what, exactly, “sexting” is—and whether we should be
worried about it. Dr. Keith Ablow, FOX News’ psychiatry expert, weighed
in with
a column entitled
“What Weiner’s sexting scandal tells us about young women today,”
concluding that it tells us that too many women are not having Private
Part Pinups texted to them against their will. Rather, Ablow writes, “I
can tell you that the average young woman no longer balks at sexting,
watching pornography, or being the aggressor sexually in a
relationship.”
Slate.com noted that while the rates of boys and
girls sexting—specifically, sending nude pictures of themselves—are
pretty much the same, boys are far more likely to send these pictures on
to their peers, resulting in often savage bullying that has culminated
in tragedies like the recent suicides of several young girls. While
Monsieur Weiner’s recurring predicaments have prompted a lot of
snickering from the media, the “sexting” problem in general has become
decidedly unfunny.
Some time ago, two of my colleagues and I were meeting with a group of
high school students who had expressed interest in getting involved
spreading the pro-life message inside their high schools. One of them
mentioned, almost off-handedly, that the pressure on girls to send
explicit pictures was constant—“they keep asking until you give in,” she
told us. Wondering just how pervasive this phenomenon was, I sent a
series of emails around asking various students whether or not that was
true—and what sort of impact that had on the high school culture. What
makes their responses even more shocking, I think, is the fact that all
of these students attend either Catholic schools or private Protestant
schools.
“I find that those who sext because of peer pressure or because they
are trying to keep someone interested are most often young girls,” one
girl responded. “I’m not saying boys don’t receive the same pressure
from friends, but I find that it is most often the girl’s job to keep
the boys interested, and what better way than to show them exactly what
they want to see? In those cases of peer pressure or those of keeping
someone interested, the people who had sexted most often tried to hide
it. What always seems to happen, though, is that the people who receive
the initial picture show it to all of their friends. Eventually rumors
spread, and friendships are ruined and people are hurt in the process.
It’s things like this that cause teenagers to hurt themselves or commit
suicide.”
Dr. Arthur Cassidy, a social psychologist commenting on the “sexting” phenomenon in
The Guardian,
agrees: “I think it’s most dominant in young girls. Many more girls buy
glossy magazines than boys, and there are more female sexually explicit
icons. Statistically you also get more attention [on online social
networking sites] if you put up a photo of yourself and the more
explicit the photo, the more responses you get…Females have more sexual
pressure on them now than ever before, so rather than focus on the inner
person, it’s about looking at the body as a sexual image.”
That, of course, is the root of the problem: “It’s about looking at the
body as a sexual image.” A thing, not a person. An object to be
desired, not a friend to be made. Another high school student wrote that
a huge number of boys in her classes were viewing pornography every
night. When they arrive at school, of course, many boys are no longer
satisfied with forming intellectual friendships with their female
peers—they want to objectify them in the same way they objectify the
faceless parade of porn stars they viewed the evening before. They want
personalized pornography, a brand new sexual high. High school girls are
pressured into thinking that in order to keep and maintain male
attention, they have to provide the very tools the boys will use to
objectify them and render them faceless.
“To be honest I was kind of happy he texted,” ‘Cassie’ wrote, “At least
someone was thinking about me. We talked about everything from dogs to
push-ups. He asked me to send him a picture. I’m not stupid and I know
what he meant, but I asked him what he wanted a picture of. This is
where I should have drawn the line or perhaps even earlier. I know that
now and did then too but didn’t particularly care. He slowed my phone
down by sending me hundreds of mega-bytes worth of pictures taken of his
bare stomach and groin. I laughed. I don’t know why. He asked for a
picture again. I sent him one of my face. His next comment was a long
exaggerated ‘noooooooooo not that’ and then ‘you made a little mistake’
(another smiley) ‘I’ll give you another chance.’ Apparently finding it
funny, that I were his student he was trying to teach. I then walked up a
flight of stairs, went inside the bathroom, angrily took my clothes
off, snapped two pictures exactly, and sent them.”
Sent, and irretrievable. Everything about this interaction shows what
is actually at play in much of the gender dynamics surrounding sexting.
He asked for a picture—she was “not stupid, and knew what he was asking
for.” She sent one of her face—and, revealingly, that was precisely what
this boy did
not want. He didn’t want to see
her; he
wanted to see her body. The eyes may be the window to the soul, but
that’s not the type of connection he was after. Rather, he was seeking
something much more carnivorous—one-sided pleasure at her expense.
And—thinking that “at least someone was thinking about me”—she complied.
(The subtle social coercion in the underlying threat of “I’ll give you
another chance” is unmistakable.) It does not take a social scientist to
see that while there are two guilty parties involved in this
transaction, exploiting the insecurities of females in a
hyper-sexualized culture for sexual gratification is, at best,
predatory. And while girls are most certainly part of the problem, it is
the girls, most often (just as in so-called “recreational” sex), that
pay the highest price.
And that reality impacts the high school culture even subliminally.
“It’s hard to walk into school every day knowing that people there had
seen something they never should have, knowing that it would be almost
impossible to live it down, forget it and move on,” ‘Lindsay’ wrote,
“You’d always get smirks and snide comments, shouts in the middle of
class or in the cafeteria, even in the hallways walking from place to
place. You’d see it all over Facebook, comments you know couldn’t be
about anyone else. You wouldn’t be able to just leave your problems at
school because they would follow you home. It’s terrible what one little
mistake can do to your life. And it’s worse that there are even demands
for pictures still, after all that has happened to other teens because
of it. I don’t think these teenagers realize how much this can affect
their lives and the lives of the other people involved.”
Searching for self-esteem and whatever they define as “love”
(unfortunately fulfilling the old maxim that boys use love to get sex,
and girls use sex to get love), girls are increasingly collaborating
with our culture’s attempt to reduce them to sex objects in the vain
hope that it will bring them what they’re looking for. If “sexting”
brings them the attention they crave, many mistakenly think that it’s
the type of attention that will be fulfilling—as ‘Richelle’ wrote, “When
they are asked to participate in that, they don’t think twice because
someone is finally ‘valuing’ them and showing interest in them. They use
it as a Band-Aid solution to what they are dealing with because
reaching out to others seems to have failed.” From music videos to
“teen” magazines to Hollywood films to TV shows targeted towards their
age groups, girls are being conditioned to think that their physical
appearance is what gives them value as people. Probably (I hope) without
even realizing it, the boys are taking advantage of this cultural
conditioning by requesting—and in many, many cases receiving—the
personalized pornography that they seek. (In many cases, it bears
mentioning, these pictures constitute child pornography.)
The problem of sexting seems to be a hard one to address, in spite of
the fact that several high-profile bullying cases resulting in suicide
have highlighted the problem and oh-so-briefly outraged the public.
Teenage sub-culture is hard for adults to penetrate, especially since
teens are now connected to each other without any adult oversight. One
girl warned me that, “If you’re trying to change the minds of teenagers
with this article, it probably won’t work.” And there’s probably a lot
of truth to that. Especially when requests for explicit pictures stem
from pornography addictions, it’s going to take a lot to convince
teenagers in high schools that this behavior is self-destructive,
demeaning, and an attack on the dignity (self-inflicted as it often may
be) of the girls sending the photos as well as the boys receiving them.
But there are a few things I can say that I hope will at least resonate
with a few teenagers. Girls: If a guy asks you for explicit pictures,
he’s implicitly told you what he wants from you. The answer is
it’s not you.
He wants your body, and in this scenario he doesn’t even want you
physically present. By sending him these pictures you’re voluntarily
reducing yourself to a one-dimensional sex object, without a
personality, without aspirations or intellect or even a voice. You are a
person with a body, not a body with a person. If the boy you’re talking
to doesn’t recognize that, then drop him hard, and wait for someone who
does. There will be guys who want to spend time with you, not just your
body.
Guys: If you’re asking for these pictures, think for a minute about
what you’re saying about girls and women in general. You’re revealing
something about yourself that’s pretty distasteful: Namely, that the
relationship you want is one defined by your particular sexual wants
rather than the presence of another person who demands—or should
demand—mutual respect and understanding. If you’re asking for these
pictures, you’re not acting the way a man should, by respecting (and in
some cases protecting) the women in your life. You are acting like a
predator, and a cannibalistic one to boot. And if the pictures are sent
to you unsolicited, you should delete them and tell her she’s worth more
than that.
The genders were created to live in harmony with each other. As long as
boys and girls choose to treat each other as sexual objects for sexual
gratification as opposed to potential friends or spouses for mutual
self-sacrifice, our culture will continue to become even more twisted
than it already is. But if instead boys and girls start seeing each
other as potential friends or spouses for mutual self-sacrifice, we can
instead begin the work of making our culture a much better place to
live.
Reprinted with permission from Unmasking Choice
Source LifeSite News
But parents are already up in arms about not only how appropriate the classes are but whether they distract from real education.
I
swear I didn’t set out to spend three posts in a row haranguing the
hacks at RH Reality Check, and I promise I’ll get back to the many other
pro-abortion propagandists out there soon. But when they keep offering
up such spectacularly disastrous attacks…well, birds gotta fly, fish
gotta swim.
Because
the evil legislators of Texas showed how much they hate women by
putting laws in place that the majority of both Texans and Americans
support, there is clearly a need to help those poor, poor Texas women
forced to have abortions before 20 weeks of pregnancy in clean,
well-regulated abortion clinics. And what better way to do that than
with a video game! Introducing 
As
we are in the midst of an elder-suicide crisis, we see elder suicide
promoted within the assisted suicide movement and its camp followers in
the media [
A
group of scientists at the University of Helsinki has published
findings in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that show
that children are capable of learning and retaining information much
earlier than previously believed possible – before even being born! More
specifically, they have found that babies in the third trimester were
able to retain and recognize specific words. These unborn babies are, in
fact, learning language while still in the womb.
Remember
those times Barack Obama was elected as president of the United States
and a bunch of pro-lifers insisted that abortion would expand under his
hands and it was the end of the world? Yeah. That didn’t happen.
Earlier
this month, the District of Columbia announced that it was giving
$375,000 to the local Planned Parenthood affiliate to help enroll people
in Obamacare. Planned Parenthood will be a “navigator”, training
representatives to help potential participants decide which plan is best
for them.
Posts
