Dutch “Better Killed than Disabled” Bigotry
By Wesley J. Smith
I have been reporting on the non-voluntary euthanasia deaths in the Netherlands for more than 20 years, the infanticide, euthanasia of the elderly “tired of life,” psychiatrists killing the mentally ill.
Often people hear this truth and yawn, “Oh, hum–but Brittany Maynard!”
Now, Gerbert van Loenen–-a Dutch journalist who once was supportive whose partner became disabled only to experience disdain from friends and doctors–-has written a book that exposes a pronounced Netherlander death-is-better-than-disabled cultural attitudes.
From a review by Barbara Kay in the National Post of Do You Call This a Life?
Van Loenen found himself brooding
over certain friends’ reactions to their situation. “It would have been
better if he had died,” one said at the outset.
Of course, disability rights activists will tell you they often hear such harsh and discriminatory attitudes here. But combining anti-disabled bigotry with the right to kill creates extreme peril for those deemed to have lives not worth living:
van Loenen says cultural
acceptance of euthanasia has progressed to the point that it is no
longer the physician who ends someone’s life without request who must
justify his actions; rather it is the physician who decides to prolong a
life perceived as meaningless who feels societal pressure.
This is absolutely consistent with my research over the last 20 years.
And it is going to get worse as the Dutch couple euthanasia with organ harvesting:
”Sorry, time to die. Someone else deserves your liver more than you.”
But Wesley! Don’t you know euthanasia is progressive and enlightened? No. I don’t.Editor’s note. This appeared on Wesley’s great blog.
Source: NRLC News
No comments:
Post a Comment